overcoming your gear: let's call it sharking (and, a giveaway!)
I’ve stood there in shops, staring through glass at glass... coveted glass.
$1599.99. $989.99. $1249.99. Even if I did have the money, how would I ever choose? I need a macro as much as I need a wide-angle. Instead my camera bag is filled with hand-me-downs and compromises, an extremely limited selection of what are generally considered the most ineffective, inexpensive, kit-grade lenses Canon has ever produced.
The Canon EF 28-80mm f/3.5-5.6 II lens is a very inexpensive starter lens with a low build quality. As long as the person using the 28-80 knows its optical shortcomings, that designation may be fine. Otherwise, they may permanently be turned off by its performance. Its optics are mediocre at best, making it nearly impossible to get ultra-sharp pictures. The price is cheap, and so is the lens; the overall workmanship and quality is low. ~ The Digital Picture
Lately, that’s the one I use most often for nature shots, including the one above.
Build quality of the 50mm f/1.8 is very cheap (as you might expect). This lens feels more like a toy than a piece of optics, with plastic contruction right down to the lens mount.
There is not much to this lens. There is no distance window or markings. There is barely even a focus ring - and the tiny ring that is there is barely usable. Only five non-rounded aperture blades are used in this lens, leading to poor bokeh (image quality of out of focus areas). ~ The Digital Picture
That’s the one I use for portraits, though I'd give it a better review than that.
And that’s pretty much it. A lensbaby for play, as-yet unmastered. A 10-20mm wide angle that’s slow, tough to focus precisely, and distorting around the edges. All mounted to a camera body that’s widely considered to be the beginner point for SLRs. Except it’s been my starting point for years.
I have never used a good lens, let alone a great one. The same goes for a camera body. I’m afraid to even pick one up for the sake of mortgage payments.
+++
Our village is filling up with summer residents, rich folk from the States, England, all points in Europe. With the onslaught of Porsche SUVs comes an onslaught of boats that eat money, sails that literally sparkle, crews outfitted in matching gear.
We’ve got a 40-year-old Shark, adopted, a family of small boats not seen much around these parts. Justin’s spent years sandblasting the keel, replacing the bulkheads, poring the internet for used sails.
"It’s so demoralizing," he said after yesterday’s race. "We came last. I can’t compete with those guys. They’re laughing at us. I don’t even have a roller furling for the jib. The rigging is from the 1960s. There’s no way I can race that boat. I don’t know why I bother."
Later, when the race results came in, Justin was shocked to discover that he hadn’t actually come last. He’d beaten two boats of the fleet. Two better-equipped boats designed to go fast. He beat them because he’s a good sailor. Not because of his boat, but in spite of it.
+++
I feel the limitations of my gear every time I reach for my camera. Clunky, lightweight, noisy, imprecise. I see it when I download, my best-case focusing turning out about as well as I imagine others’ worst-cases.
But every now and then, someone who knows about cameras looks at my images and says, “What do you shoot with?” and I tell them. And in that moment, I get... props.
None of this is a competition, but indulge my metaphor: when it comes to light-bending and composition and storytelling with my camera, plenty of people are ahead of me. I’ll never catch them—not with this glass. But I’m not DFL, either (to borrow from the nautical, Dead F*cking Last).
And for now, I’m content with that. I’ll keep pushing, nudging, compensating, overcoming, until $1249.99 falls from the sky into my lap.
+++
Hello Giveaway!
It’s random giveaway time from our friends at Hello Canvas.
Leave a comment here between now and Tuesday at midnight, and you could win a 20x24 canvas of your photo of choice from Hello Canvas! The prompt: What’s your relationship to your gear? Does it define you? Delight you? Confine you? What are you most grateful for, and how do you see your stable of lenses and equipment evolving in the next year?
Also, winners from our Hello Gorgeous mini contest will be announced on Tuesday. Wheeee!
The winner of the Hello Canvas 20x24 canvas print is Bekkah of Through the Lens, our 68th commenter. Congratulations, Bekkah! And thanks so much to everyone for sharing your thoughts on gear, both today's and tomorrow's (and wishlists).
Reader Comments (136)
Love the parallel of Justin's boat and your camera. Love it.
I am really not an equipment/gear person at all. I am strictly an amateur and have no plans to become professional...I just like taking photos for myself and my family...I have been very happy with my G9 point and shoot for the most part...and it is fun trying to get the most out if it that I possibly can. It is also easy to throw in my pocketbook and therefore I always have it with me...and as everyone knows the best camera is the one you have with you.,,Unfortunately I have gotten a scratch on my baby's lens and this led me to upgrade to a Rebel with a kit lens which I have been having fun with too. This doesn't mean that I don't have a wish list ...I'm eyeing a G11 and a zoom lens, and a 50mm prime lens, and a Polaroid SX-70...but I will be happy without...
My gear DOES NOT define me, nor confine me. I can squeeze a lot out of my equipment. In fact, I shocked many pro photographers and amateurs too who learned I was using a dynamite little D40 that put out some pretty fantastic images. Sure, that D40 is now primarily my back up camera, but just because I've been using a D300, does not mean my photography improved. It only added another layer to what I already had.
Future equipment will be some lighting plus another portrait lens. As much as I'd LOVE a macro lens, a macro simply doesn't make sense for my work right now.
I appreciate the equipment I do have and I steer away from trendy equipment such as Lens Baby lenses. I guess I'm more pragmatic than most, but that's me :~)
Thanks for asking :)
Diane
I really do love them both and my Canon 7D but we've got a long journey ahead of us. A journey that I am really really really looking forward to.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/7687752@N03/4679204968/
As many others have echoed in their comments, the person behind the lens is more of a factor than any expensive lens. Money can't buy you beautiful photography...
Please enter me in the giveaway contest!
And WOW wouldn't I LOVE to win that canvas giveaway!!
That being said, I am grateful for the past two years where I learned about composition and how to use my camera, rather than merely falling back on the equipment.
I don't mind.
I am just moving beyond my trusty point-and-shoot, having received my first SLR at Christmas. My lens inventory consists of the lens kit. I received the 50mm f/1.8 for Mother's Day. This equipment is all the challenge I need at the moment (ignorance is bliss, no?), but in all seriousness I do look forward to gaining comfortability and the possibility of more challenging equipment.
On a separate note, I have learned so much from your site. Thanks so much for the inspiration you provide to us daily.
I was speaking with a friend who has been a professional architectural photographer for many years. I mentioned that my lenses weren't so great, and he told me, "They don't have to be." That's all it took. He didn't even have to spell it out. Great equipment does not necessarily a great photographer make. (Not that they wouldn't be nice! :) )
My first lens I used was a Nikon 50mm . My husband never let me touch any other lens (even though he had really really goood ones). It was the cheapest and best lens to learn. I had no zoom, I was the zoom. It pushed me to be creative. My husband laways says, push your gear to the maximum. No need for fancy stuff!
Now, that I have other equipment, I still love shooting with my 50mm, even though i have better equipment.
Now I've been *gifted* what I consider a rockstar camera. I longed for a new lens for years and was delighted and shocked when my husband went for the lens AND body. I was intimidated to even take it out of the box for days after it arrived. People see it and take me seriously. And it does take stunning pictures, sometimes, and when they're something less than stunning, I have no one to blame but myself. I'm still learning this camera, nearly a year later. And I find a growing love for it too. When my 11 year old stepson wants to take over, I get a little twitchy and probably grab my camera back too soon. ;-)
I would LOVE a canvas! Been considering one. Hardest part will be picking which picture!
Then I'll dream about the 5D. But not before then. ;)
I own a Lumix point and shoot, and a film camera, a Nikkormat as old as my uncle.
I love the digital because it's all I got in that aspect, even if it's barely manual.
And I certainly ADORE my Nikkormat. She's been with me for a long long time now. Maybe more than twenty years. I will never regret buying it from my sister. And I made a promise to never sell it!
But... I'd love a digital reflex already.
"Photography is not about cameras, gadgets and gismos. Photography is about photographers. A camera didn't make a great picture any more than a typewriter wrote a great novel." - Peter Adams
It reminds me that even though I do not own an expensive camera, or a lens(if anyone can believe that) I too can make and create beautiful photos. I can do anything as long as I dream big and love what I do. That is what makes all of you and I, great. =)
It's OK. I have heard it before.
I have shot for the past three years with a Canon PowerShot. Won a few contests with those photos.
Sweet!
I aim to keep it simple. Yes, I may feel that way because I simply haven't the funds to purchase lenses for my sparkly new Canon Rebel. I would like a macro. A wide angle. A telephoto.
I make do with what I have, and it works pretty darn well for me :)
Glad I stumbled upon your post!