up for interpretation


I was lucky enough to get to spend the majority of my spring break on a beautiful, pristine, sunshiny beach at the tip of Baja, Mexico. It was heaven. Sifting through my images, all I see are blue blue skies, blue blue water and golden golden sand. With 99% sunshine, even the sunsets are vibrant. Soft light on that beach was nearly non-existent. It was just the quality of how the light was; clean, bright, un-filtered. In a word, vibrant.
I'm not complaining. Not one single bit. But what I find curious is how I am chosing to interpret my vacation images. We had next to no internet access so there were only a very select number of images that would even load through my Instragram. Most of the them were shot or altered in a way that didn't showcase the blue blues or golden goldens. The first was shot upon arrival, near dark (which was the only time the light got soft). Another was captured upon waking; the soft, dreamy view from my bed in the morning. And my favorite was one of my daughter in the water, captured at the peak of bright, vibrant light and color (and yet, it's a black and white). Go figure.
As I mused on which image I would share today, I found this gem from my iPhone. The original was, of course, saturated with the bright blue sky and yet my choice was to dial it way down, to give it a vintage postcard feel (via Lightroom) which in other words means to interpret it in a totally different way than it came straight out of the camera.
As photographers, we are artists. And as artists we have the option to manipulate our images the way we want to. We can use our photo editing tools the same way painters use paint. We are the masters of our photographic vision. Personally, I don't know why I edit images like I do. I just do what feels right for each image and follow my creative bliss.
Have you ever thought about your process of processing? Do you use a heavy hand? Are you more subtle? Do you love acclassic black and white or SOOC? Share with us what you find and link to an image that shows off your favorite interpretation today.
Reader Comments (17)
http://www.marciescudderphotography.com/home/2012/4/12/april-showers.html
And other times - it's all about the color..and I love to saturate:
http://www.marciescudderphotography.com/home/2012/4/15/children-of-the-world.html
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gamaraca/7080551493/in/photostream/
http://dorisrudddesigns.wordpress.com/2012/04/15/dandelion-love/
Generally, I take a photo by photo approach to editing and it also depends what I want to achieve overall with the shot. I love the possibilities of post processing and think it's a great element of the creative process.
http://www.catchingsundust.com/2012/04/happiness-photo-21.html
what i try to do with my photography is focus on the extra in the ordinary....capturing unusual aspects of or within ordinary things or situations... this is what i consider my artistry, the talent that allows me to make the viewers of my images see the ordinary in a new and surprising way.
manipulating my images other than some cropping, straightening and minimal adjusting of hues, contrast and highlights somehow feels wrong for me. that's why i only use hipstamatic (which for me is a pre-processing tool) and non of the other photo-apps i have on my iPhone.
strangely enough i started off as a web designer, then turned to photoshop, creating new images (digital collages) by post-processing photographs, and now i have ended up here, using only my camera, my technical knowledge and my composition skills (which you have taught me a lot about, remember...:-()
for me this is the creative bliss i am following
on my daily practice blog i just posted this image of the sea at Kijkduin, near Den Haag. Everything was exactly the way it looks in the picture, the light, the hues, the lines, the silhouettes of the two people, my 'interpretation' or 'manipulation' lies solely in the way i framed the shot
http://kiekjevandedag.blogspot.com/2012/04/zeezicht.html
http://focusingonlifegrp.blogspot.com/2012/04/one-of-my-favorite-things-spring.html
I was in love with the deep blue skies the day I took this picture and, like you, was surprised when I ended up editing the blue right out of the scene. But no matter how much I tried to like the version that was more like the actual day, I loved the one below instead.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/debmedina/7066653075/
I realized that I don't have just one signature way of processing- I really try to match the mood that felt while shooting and go from there.
This is one of my most recent photos and I love the way it turned out- it really does match the mood I was after and how I saw the shot in my mind...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/glitch_nitch/7077530035/in/photostream
This one was cropped, put in black and white, and everything except my toes was put out of focus.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/77068669@N07/7046862343/in/photostream/
I'm always up for deepening hues of colors in my photos. I was lucky enough to capture this gem and didn't feel the need to edit it ;)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gottarun2009/6801343573/in/photostream/
after processing,
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gottarun2009/6811916451/in/photostream/
not sure I like one over the other, just two very different moods of the same shot.
http://petinahopephotography.wordpress.com/2012/04/15/portrait-easter-with-my-nephews/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/autumnsun/7039084581/